The piece argues Norway's sovereign wealth fund ($2T+) should acquire OpenAI ($800B valuation) and transfer it to international governance, treating AI as a commons-enclosure problem. The core claim: because LLMs derive from publicly-funded research, internet infrastructure, and crowdsourced data, their ownership represents theft from collective humanity; private concentration of AI benefits poses civilizational risk; Norway—as a stable democracy with cosmopolitan foreign policy and proven wealth management—is uniquely positioned to act as a custodian during transfer to multilateral control. The proposal hinges on three factual premises the source asserts but doesn't rigorously defend: (1) OpenAI's current valuation and the feasibility of liquidating 40% of GPF-G holdings, (2) that Norway's existing track record (conflict mediation, foreign aid, the Seed Vault) demonstrates capacity to steward AGI-scale systems, and (3) that US political blockage is a surmountable constraint given "future administrations." The author frames this as necessary "policy imagination" pushing the Overton window, acknowledging the proposal is currently implausible. One sharp tension: if the concern is concentration of power, would moving OpenAI into Norwegian state hands—even with eventual multilateral transfer—create intermediate centralization risks the source doesn't address?